2007-2008, 7th, ELA

Choose a record to view

 
School year
School
Grade
Subject
2007-2008
TITO PUENTE EDUCATION COMPLEX
7th
ELA

Teacher evaluation

Subject
ELA
Grade
7th
School number
04M117
School name
TITO PUENTE EDUCATION COMPLEX
Experience level
5 Years
Number of years of value-added data in report
1
First name of first teacher listed
CEASAR
Last name of first teacher listed
JOHNSON
First name of second teacher listed
Second name of second teacher listed
Percentile rank of multi-year value added score
0
Number of students used in multi-year score
15
Percentile rank of single year value-added score
0
Number of students used in value-added score
11
Percentile rank of score with top 3rd students
Performance percentile rank middle 3rd students
Percentile rank of score lowest 3rd students
0
Percentile rank of score with male students
0
Percentile rank of score with female students
Percentile rank of score, Eng. Language Learners
Percentile rank with students with disabilities
0
Starting avg. score, students in multi-year score
2.44
postTestMulti
-0.31
predictedMulti
0.01
Multi-year value-added score
-0.31
Minimum of margin of error multi-year rank
0
Maximum of margin of error multi-year rank
3
Starting average score of students in 09-10 score
2.53
Actual average score of students in 09-10 score
-0.45
Predicted avg. score of students in 09-10 score
-0.13
2009-10 score
-0.32
Minimum margin of error for 09-10 percentile rank
0
Maximum margin of error for 09-10 percentile rank
4
Starting avg. score of top 3rd performing students
Actual avg. score of top 3rd performing students
Predicted avg. score, top 3rd performing students
Value-added score with top 3rd performing students
Minimum margin of error for rank top 3rd students
Maximum margin of error for rank top 3rd students
Starting avg. score middle 3rd performing students
Actual avg. score middle 3rd performing students
Predicted avg. score middle 3rd perf. students
Value-added score with middle 3rd perf. students
Min. of error margin for rank middle 3rd students
Max. of error margin for rank middle 3rd students
Starting avg. score lowest 3rd performing students
2.35
Actual avg. score lowest 3rd performing students
-0.34
Predicted avg. score lowest 3rd perf. students
-0.01
Value-added score lowest 3rd performing students
-0.33
Min. of error margin for rank lowest 3rd students
0
Max. of error margin for rank lowest 3rd students
2
Starting average score of male students
2.46
Actual average score of male students
-0.25
Predicted average score of male students
0.01
Value-added score with male students
-0.27
Min. of error margin for rank male students
0
Max. of error margin for rank male students
15
Starting average score of female students
Actual average score of female students
Predicted average score of female students
Value-added score with female students
Min. of error margin for rank female students
Max. of error margin for rank female students
Starting average score of English Lang. Learners
Actual average score of English Language Learners
Predicted average score of English Lang. Learners
Value-added score with English Language Learners
Min. of error margin on English Lang. Learners
Max. of error margin on English Lang. Learners
Starting avg. score of students with disabilities
2.44
Actual average score of students with disabilities
-0.31
Predicted average score students with disabilities
0.01
Value-added score with students with disabilities
-0.31
Min. of error margin on students with disabilities
0
Max. of error margin on students with disabilities
3
Performance for percentile rank top 3rd students
* = Top 3rd score high or low; high error margin
Percentile rank of score with middle 3rd students
* = Mid 3rd score high or low; high error margin
Performance percentile rank lowest 3rd students
LOW
* = Lowest 3rd rank high or low; high error margin
Performance category for rank with male students
LOW
* = Rank with male high or low; high error margin
Performance category for rank with female students
* = Female rank high or low; high error margin
Performance for rank with Eng. Learners
* = Eng. Lang. rank high or low; high error margin
Performance rank with students with disabilities
LOW
* Disabled rank high or low; high error margin
Start avg score of top 3rd school-wide students
Actual avg. gain in score of top 3rd students
Predicted avg. gain in score of top 3rd students
Value-added score, top 3rd students in ratings
Percentile score, school-wide top 3rd students
Performance category, top 3rd performing students
* = Top 3rd rank high or low; high error margin
Min. error margin, school-wide top 3rd student.
Max. error margin, school-wide top 3rd student
Starting avg. score, school-wide mid 3rd students
Actual avg. score, school-wide mid 3rd students
Predicted average gain in middle 3rd students
Value-added score, school-wide middle 3rd students
Percentile score, school-wide middle 3rd students
Performance with school-wide middle 3rd students
* = Performance high or low; high error margin
Min. error margin, school-wide mid 3rd students.
Max. error margin, school-wide mid 3rd students
Starting avg. school-wide lowest 3rd students
2.28
Actual avg. gain, school-wide lowest 3rd students
-0.36
Predicted avg. gain with lowest 3rd students
-0.03
V.A. score with school-wide lowest 3rd students
-0.32
Percentile score, school-wide lowest 3rd students
0
Performance for score, lowest 3rd students
LOW
* = Performance was high or low; high error margin
Min. error margin with lowest 3rd students
0
Max. error margin with lowest 3rd students
3
Number students used for 06-07 value-added score
Starting avg student score in 2006-07 V.A. score
Actual average gain in score of 2006-07 students
Predicted average gain in student score in 2006-07
2006-07 value-added score in proficiency ratings
Percentile score of 2006-07 value-added score
Min. error margin for 06-07 value-added score
Max. error margin for 06-07 value-added score
Number students used in 2005-06 value-added score
Start avg. of students, 2005-06 value-added score
Actual average gain of students 2005-06 score
Predicted average gain of students 2005-06 score
2005-06 value-added score in proficiency ratings
Percentile score of 2005-06 value-added score
Min. error margin for 2005-06 value-added score
Max. error margin for 2005-06 value-added score
Number students in citywide multi-year V.A. score
15
Start avg. of students, citywide multi-year score
2.44
Actual avg. gain in score of students, citywide
-0.31
Predicted avg. gain in student scores, citywide
0.01
Citywide multi-year value-added score in ratings
-0.31
Percentile score, multi-year citywide value added
0
Min. error margin, citywide multi-year value-added
0
Max. error margin, citywide multi-year value-added
0
Number of students used in citywide 2007-08 score
11
Start avg. student score in 07-08 citywide rating
2.53
Actual average gain in score in 07-08 rating
-0.45
Predicted gain in score in 07-08 rating
-0.11
2007-08 citywide value-added score in ratings
-0.34
Percentile score of 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
0
Min. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
0
Max. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
0
Number of students used in citywide 2007-08 score
Start avg. student score in 07-08 citywide rating
Actual average gain in score in 07-08 rating
Predicted gain in score in 07-08 rating
2007-08 citywide value-added score in ratings
Percentile score of 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
Min. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
Max. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
Number students, citywide 05-06 value-added score
Start avg. score of students, citywide V.A. score
Actual average gain of students, citywide V.A.
Predicted average gain of students, citywide V.A.
2005-06 citywide value-added score in ratings
Percentile score 2005-06 citywide value-added
Min. error margin, 2005-06 V.A. percentile score
Max. error margin for 2006-07 citywide percentile
The years of value-added data in report
2007-08