2007-2008, 8th, ELA

Choose a record to view

 
School year
School
Grade
Subject
2007-2008
J.H.S. 218 JAMES P. SINNOTT
8th
ELA

Teacher evaluation

Subject
ELA
Grade
8th
School number
19K218
School name
J.H.S. 218 JAMES P. SINNOTT
Experience level
10+ Yrs
Number of years of value-added data in report
3
First name of first teacher listed
NATHAN
Last name of first teacher listed
CHANDLER
First name of second teacher listed
Second name of second teacher listed
Percentile rank of multi-year value added score
43
Number of students used in multi-year score
141
Percentile rank of single year value-added score
56
Number of students used in value-added score
38
Percentile rank of score with top 3rd students
64
Performance percentile rank middle 3rd students
45
Percentile rank of score lowest 3rd students
22
Percentile rank of score with male students
45
Percentile rank of score with female students
42
Percentile rank of score, Eng. Language Learners
Percentile rank with students with disabilities
Starting avg. score, students in multi-year score
2.95
postTestMulti
-0.01
predictedMulti
-0.03
Multi-year value-added score
0.02
Minimum of margin of error multi-year rank
26
Maximum of margin of error multi-year rank
62
Starting average score of students in 09-10 score
3.01
Actual average score of students in 09-10 score
0.05
Predicted avg. score of students in 09-10 score
0.06
2009-10 score
-0.01
Minimum margin of error for 09-10 percentile rank
13
Maximum margin of error for 09-10 percentile rank
93
Starting avg. score of top 3rd performing students
3.49
Actual avg. score of top 3rd performing students
-0.12
Predicted avg. score, top 3rd performing students
-0.19
Value-added score with top 3rd performing students
0.08
Minimum margin of error for rank top 3rd students
33
Maximum margin of error for rank top 3rd students
88
Starting avg. score middle 3rd performing students
2.95
Actual avg. score middle 3rd performing students
0.01
Predicted avg. score middle 3rd perf. students
-0.01
Value-added score with middle 3rd perf. students
0.03
Min. of error margin for rank middle 3rd students
18
Max. of error margin for rank middle 3rd students
76
Starting avg. score lowest 3rd performing students
2.42
Actual avg. score lowest 3rd performing students
0.08
Predicted avg. score lowest 3rd perf. students
0.13
Value-added score lowest 3rd performing students
-0.05
Min. of error margin for rank lowest 3rd students
6
Max. of error margin for rank lowest 3rd students
53
Starting average score of male students
2.88
Actual average score of male students
-0.01
Predicted average score of male students
-0.03
Value-added score with male students
0.02
Min. of error margin for rank male students
22
Max. of error margin for rank male students
70
Starting average score of female students
3.04
Actual average score of female students
-0.01
Predicted average score of female students
-0.02
Value-added score with female students
0.02
Min. of error margin for rank female students
19
Max. of error margin for rank female students
69
Starting average score of English Lang. Learners
Actual average score of English Language Learners
Predicted average score of English Lang. Learners
Value-added score with English Language Learners
Min. of error margin on English Lang. Learners
Max. of error margin on English Lang. Learners
Starting avg. score of students with disabilities
Actual average score of students with disabilities
Predicted average score students with disabilities
Value-added score with students with disabilities
Min. of error margin on students with disabilities
Max. of error margin on students with disabilities
Performance for percentile rank top 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Top 3rd score high or low; high error margin
Percentile rank of score with middle 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Mid 3rd score high or low; high error margin
Performance percentile rank lowest 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Lowest 3rd rank high or low; high error margin
Performance category for rank with male students
MIDDLE
* = Rank with male high or low; high error margin
Performance category for rank with female students
MIDDLE
* = Female rank high or low; high error margin
Performance for rank with Eng. Learners
* = Eng. Lang. rank high or low; high error margin
Performance rank with students with disabilities
* Disabled rank high or low; high error margin
Start avg score of top 3rd school-wide students
3.39
Actual avg. gain in score of top 3rd students
-0.08
Predicted avg. gain in score of top 3rd students
-0.17
Value-added score, top 3rd students in ratings
0.09
Percentile score, school-wide top 3rd students
68
Performance category, top 3rd performing students
MIDDLE
* = Top 3rd rank high or low; high error margin
Min. error margin, school-wide top 3rd student.
40
Max. error margin, school-wide top 3rd student
88
Starting avg. score, school-wide mid 3rd students
2.82
Actual avg. score, school-wide mid 3rd students
0
Predicted average gain in middle 3rd students
0.04
Value-added score, school-wide middle 3rd students
-0.04
Percentile score, school-wide middle 3rd students
24
Performance with school-wide middle 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Performance high or low; high error margin
Min. error margin, school-wide mid 3rd students.
6
Max. error margin, school-wide mid 3rd students
54
Starting avg. school-wide lowest 3rd students
2.31
Actual avg. gain, school-wide lowest 3rd students
0.11
Predicted avg. gain with lowest 3rd students
0.13
V.A. score with school-wide lowest 3rd students
-0.03
Percentile score, school-wide lowest 3rd students
28
Performance for score, lowest 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Performance was high or low; high error margin
Min. error margin with lowest 3rd students
6
Max. error margin with lowest 3rd students
66
Number students used for 06-07 value-added score
54
Starting avg student score in 2006-07 V.A. score
2.87
Actual average gain in score of 2006-07 students
-0.06
Predicted average gain in student score in 2006-07
-0.08
2006-07 value-added score in proficiency ratings
0.02
Percentile score of 2006-07 value-added score
37
Min. error margin for 06-07 value-added score
3
Max. error margin for 06-07 value-added score
89
Number students used in 2005-06 value-added score
49
Start avg. of students, 2005-06 value-added score
3.07
Actual average gain of students 2005-06 score
0
Predicted average gain of students 2005-06 score
0.02
2005-06 value-added score in proficiency ratings
-0.02
Percentile score of 2005-06 value-added score
57
Min. error margin for 2005-06 value-added score
28
Max. error margin for 2005-06 value-added score
83
Number students in citywide multi-year V.A. score
141
Start avg. of students, citywide multi-year score
2.95
Actual avg. gain in score of students, citywide
-0.01
Predicted avg. gain in student scores, citywide
-0.05
Citywide multi-year value-added score in ratings
0.04
Percentile score, multi-year citywide value added
62
Min. error margin, citywide multi-year value-added
44
Max. error margin, citywide multi-year value-added
78
Number of students used in citywide 2007-08 score
38
Start avg. student score in 07-08 citywide rating
3.01
Actual average gain in score in 07-08 rating
0.05
Predicted gain in score in 07-08 rating
0.07
2007-08 citywide value-added score in ratings
-0.01
Percentile score of 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
49
Min. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
10
Max. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
89
Number of students used in citywide 2007-08 score
54
Start avg. student score in 07-08 citywide rating
2.87
Actual average gain in score in 07-08 rating
-0.06
Predicted gain in score in 07-08 rating
-0.14
2007-08 citywide value-added score in ratings
0.08
Percentile score of 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
78
Min. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
23
Max. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
99
Number students, citywide 05-06 value-added score
49
Start avg. score of students, citywide V.A. score
3.07
Actual average gain of students, citywide V.A.
0
Predicted average gain of students, citywide V.A.
0.03
2005-06 citywide value-added score in ratings
-0.03
Percentile score 2005-06 citywide value-added
41
Min. error margin, 2005-06 V.A. percentile score
16
Max. error margin for 2006-07 citywide percentile
70
The years of value-added data in report
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08