2007-2008, 5th, ELA

Choose a record to view

 
School year
School
Grade
Subject
2007-2008
P.S. 076 WILLIAM HALLET
5th
ELA
2007-2008
P.S. 076 WILLIAM HALLET
5th
MATH

Teacher evaluation

Subject
ELA
Grade
5th
School number
30Q076
School name
P.S. 076 WILLIAM HALLET
Experience level
5 Years
Number of years of value-added data in report
3
First name of first teacher listed
BARBARA
Last name of first teacher listed
ONEAL
First name of second teacher listed
Second name of second teacher listed
Percentile rank of multi-year value added score
68
Number of students used in multi-year score
59
Percentile rank of single year value-added score
53
Number of students used in value-added score
17
Percentile rank of score with top 3rd students
Performance percentile rank middle 3rd students
72
Percentile rank of score lowest 3rd students
62
Percentile rank of score with male students
69
Percentile rank of score with female students
67
Percentile rank of score, Eng. Language Learners
Percentile rank with students with disabilities
82
Starting avg. score, students in multi-year score
2.85
postTestMulti
0.07
predictedMulti
-0.03
Multi-year value-added score
0.09
Minimum of margin of error multi-year rank
46
Maximum of margin of error multi-year rank
85
Starting average score of students in 09-10 score
3.02
Actual average score of students in 09-10 score
-0.01
Predicted avg. score of students in 09-10 score
-0.02
2009-10 score
0.01
Minimum margin of error for 09-10 percentile rank
11
Maximum margin of error for 09-10 percentile rank
91
Starting avg. score of top 3rd performing students
Actual avg. score of top 3rd performing students
Predicted avg. score, top 3rd performing students
Value-added score with top 3rd performing students
Minimum margin of error for rank top 3rd students
Maximum margin of error for rank top 3rd students
Starting avg. score middle 3rd performing students
2.98
Actual avg. score middle 3rd performing students
0.06
Predicted avg. score middle 3rd perf. students
-0.05
Value-added score with middle 3rd perf. students
0.11
Min. of error margin for rank middle 3rd students
41
Max. of error margin for rank middle 3rd students
92
Starting avg. score lowest 3rd performing students
2.56
Actual avg. score lowest 3rd performing students
0.1
Predicted avg. score lowest 3rd perf. students
0.03
Value-added score lowest 3rd performing students
0.07
Min. of error margin for rank lowest 3rd students
29
Max. of error margin for rank lowest 3rd students
88
Starting average score of male students
2.85
Actual average score of male students
0.08
Predicted average score of male students
-0.02
Value-added score with male students
0.1
Min. of error margin for rank male students
37
Max. of error margin for rank male students
91
Starting average score of female students
2.84
Actual average score of female students
0.06
Predicted average score of female students
-0.03
Value-added score with female students
0.09
Min. of error margin for rank female students
37
Max. of error margin for rank female students
88
Starting average score of English Lang. Learners
Actual average score of English Language Learners
Predicted average score of English Lang. Learners
Value-added score with English Language Learners
Min. of error margin on English Lang. Learners
Max. of error margin on English Lang. Learners
Starting avg. score of students with disabilities
2.83
Actual average score of students with disabilities
0.02
Predicted average score students with disabilities
-0.13
Value-added score with students with disabilities
0.15
Min. of error margin on students with disabilities
32
Max. of error margin on students with disabilities
99
Performance for percentile rank top 3rd students
* = Top 3rd score high or low; high error margin
Percentile rank of score with middle 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Mid 3rd score high or low; high error margin
Performance percentile rank lowest 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Lowest 3rd rank high or low; high error margin
Performance category for rank with male students
MIDDLE
* = Rank with male high or low; high error margin
Performance category for rank with female students
MIDDLE
* = Female rank high or low; high error margin
Performance for rank with Eng. Learners
* = Eng. Lang. rank high or low; high error margin
Performance rank with students with disabilities
HIGH
* Disabled rank high or low; high error margin
*
Start avg score of top 3rd school-wide students
3.31
Actual avg. gain in score of top 3rd students
-0.01
Predicted avg. gain in score of top 3rd students
-0.15
Value-added score, top 3rd students in ratings
0.14
Percentile score, school-wide top 3rd students
79
Performance category, top 3rd performing students
MIDDLE
* = Top 3rd rank high or low; high error margin
Min. error margin, school-wide top 3rd student.
31
Max. error margin, school-wide top 3rd student
98
Starting avg. score, school-wide mid 3rd students
2.87
Actual avg. score, school-wide mid 3rd students
0.09
Predicted average gain in middle 3rd students
-0.01
Value-added score, school-wide middle 3rd students
0.09
Percentile score, school-wide middle 3rd students
67
Performance with school-wide middle 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Performance high or low; high error margin
Min. error margin, school-wide mid 3rd students.
38
Max. error margin, school-wide mid 3rd students
89
Starting avg. school-wide lowest 3rd students
2.48
Actual avg. gain, school-wide lowest 3rd students
0.09
Predicted avg. gain with lowest 3rd students
0.02
V.A. score with school-wide lowest 3rd students
0.07
Percentile score, school-wide lowest 3rd students
61
Performance for score, lowest 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Performance was high or low; high error margin
Min. error margin with lowest 3rd students
21
Max. error margin with lowest 3rd students
91
Number students used for 06-07 value-added score
21
Starting avg student score in 2006-07 V.A. score
2.81
Actual average gain in score of 2006-07 students
0.25
Predicted average gain in student score in 2006-07
0.18
2006-07 value-added score in proficiency ratings
0.07
Percentile score of 2006-07 value-added score
69
Min. error margin for 06-07 value-added score
17
Max. error margin for 06-07 value-added score
97
Number students used in 2005-06 value-added score
21
Start avg. of students, 2005-06 value-added score
2.9
Actual average gain of students 2005-06 score
-0.02
Predicted average gain of students 2005-06 score
-0.12
2005-06 value-added score in proficiency ratings
0.1
Percentile score of 2005-06 value-added score
47
Min. error margin for 2005-06 value-added score
8
Max. error margin for 2005-06 value-added score
89
Number students in citywide multi-year V.A. score
59
Start avg. of students, citywide multi-year score
2.85
Actual avg. gain in score of students, citywide
0.07
Predicted avg. gain in student scores, citywide
-0.04
Citywide multi-year value-added score in ratings
0.1
Percentile score, multi-year citywide value added
76
Min. error margin, citywide multi-year value-added
56
Max. error margin, citywide multi-year value-added
90
Number of students used in citywide 2007-08 score
17
Start avg. student score in 07-08 citywide rating
3.02
Actual average gain in score in 07-08 rating
-0.01
Predicted gain in score in 07-08 rating
-0.01
2007-08 citywide value-added score in ratings
0.01
Percentile score of 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
51
Min. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
10
Max. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
91
Number of students used in citywide 2007-08 score
21
Start avg. student score in 07-08 citywide rating
2.81
Actual average gain in score in 07-08 rating
0.25
Predicted gain in score in 07-08 rating
0.2
2007-08 citywide value-added score in ratings
0.06
Percentile score of 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
67
Min. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
16
Max. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
97
Number students, citywide 05-06 value-added score
21
Start avg. score of students, citywide V.A. score
2.9
Actual average gain of students, citywide V.A.
-0.02
Predicted average gain of students, citywide V.A.
-0.13
2005-06 citywide value-added score in ratings
0.11
Percentile score 2005-06 citywide value-added
74
Min. error margin, 2005-06 V.A. percentile score
25
Max. error margin for 2006-07 citywide percentile
97
The years of value-added data in report
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08