2007-2008, 4th, ELA

Choose a record to view

 
School year
School
Grade
Subject
2007-2008
P.S. 9 RYER AVENUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
4th
ELA
2007-2008
P.S. 9 RYER AVENUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
4th
MATH

Teacher evaluation

Subject
ELA
Grade
4th
School number
10X009
School name
P.S. 9 RYER AVENUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Experience level
10+ Yrs
Number of years of value-added data in report
3
First name of first teacher listed
MARIA
Last name of first teacher listed
MONTEAGUDO
First name of second teacher listed
Second name of second teacher listed
Percentile rank of multi-year value added score
32
Number of students used in multi-year score
47
Percentile rank of single year value-added score
39
Number of students used in value-added score
18
Percentile rank of score with top 3rd students
Performance percentile rank middle 3rd students
45
Percentile rank of score lowest 3rd students
27
Percentile rank of score with male students
22
Percentile rank of score with female students
42
Percentile rank of score, Eng. Language Learners
Percentile rank with students with disabilities
25
Starting avg. score, students in multi-year score
2.93
postTestMulti
-0.01
predictedMulti
0.06
Multi-year value-added score
-0.07
Minimum of margin of error multi-year rank
14
Maximum of margin of error multi-year rank
57
Starting average score of students in 09-10 score
2.86
Actual average score of students in 09-10 score
0
Predicted avg. score of students in 09-10 score
0.05
2009-10 score
-0.05
Minimum margin of error for 09-10 percentile rank
8
Maximum margin of error for 09-10 percentile rank
81
Starting avg. score of top 3rd performing students
Actual avg. score of top 3rd performing students
Predicted avg. score, top 3rd performing students
Value-added score with top 3rd performing students
Minimum margin of error for rank top 3rd students
Maximum margin of error for rank top 3rd students
Starting avg. score middle 3rd performing students
3.04
Actual avg. score middle 3rd performing students
-0.02
Predicted avg. score middle 3rd perf. students
0
Value-added score with middle 3rd perf. students
-0.02
Min. of error margin for rank middle 3rd students
14
Max. of error margin for rank middle 3rd students
80
Starting avg. score lowest 3rd performing students
2.47
Actual avg. score lowest 3rd performing students
0.14
Predicted avg. score lowest 3rd perf. students
0.24
Value-added score lowest 3rd performing students
-0.1
Min. of error margin for rank lowest 3rd students
6
Max. of error margin for rank lowest 3rd students
64
Starting average score of male students
2.92
Actual average score of male students
-0.09
Predicted average score of male students
0.03
Value-added score with male students
-0.12
Min. of error margin for rank male students
4
Max. of error margin for rank male students
57
Starting average score of female students
2.93
Actual average score of female students
0.05
Predicted average score of female students
0.08
Value-added score with female students
-0.03
Min. of error margin for rank female students
15
Max. of error margin for rank female students
74
Starting average score of English Lang. Learners
Actual average score of English Language Learners
Predicted average score of English Lang. Learners
Value-added score with English Language Learners
Min. of error margin on English Lang. Learners
Max. of error margin on English Lang. Learners
Starting avg. score of students with disabilities
2.56
Actual average score of students with disabilities
0.01
Predicted average score students with disabilities
0.12
Value-added score with students with disabilities
-0.11
Min. of error margin on students with disabilities
2
Max. of error margin on students with disabilities
73
Performance for percentile rank top 3rd students
* = Top 3rd score high or low; high error margin
Percentile rank of score with middle 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Mid 3rd score high or low; high error margin
Performance percentile rank lowest 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Lowest 3rd rank high or low; high error margin
Performance category for rank with male students
MIDDLE
* = Rank with male high or low; high error margin
Performance category for rank with female students
MIDDLE
* = Female rank high or low; high error margin
Performance for rank with Eng. Learners
* = Eng. Lang. rank high or low; high error margin
Performance rank with students with disabilities
MIDDLE
* Disabled rank high or low; high error margin
Start avg score of top 3rd school-wide students
3.44
Actual avg. gain in score of top 3rd students
-0.2
Predicted avg. gain in score of top 3rd students
-0.1
Value-added score, top 3rd students in ratings
-0.1
Percentile score, school-wide top 3rd students
27
Performance category, top 3rd performing students
MIDDLE
* = Top 3rd rank high or low; high error margin
Min. error margin, school-wide top 3rd student.
5
Max. error margin, school-wide top 3rd student
66
Starting avg. score, school-wide mid 3rd students
2.84
Actual avg. score, school-wide mid 3rd students
0.02
Predicted average gain in middle 3rd students
0.05
Value-added score, school-wide middle 3rd students
-0.03
Percentile score, school-wide middle 3rd students
43
Performance with school-wide middle 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Performance high or low; high error margin
Min. error margin, school-wide mid 3rd students.
12
Max. error margin, school-wide mid 3rd students
79
Starting avg. school-wide lowest 3rd students
2.34
Actual avg. gain, school-wide lowest 3rd students
0.2
Predicted avg. gain with lowest 3rd students
0.3
V.A. score with school-wide lowest 3rd students
-0.1
Percentile score, school-wide lowest 3rd students
26
Performance for score, lowest 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Performance was high or low; high error margin
Min. error margin with lowest 3rd students
3
Max. error margin with lowest 3rd students
72
Number students used for 06-07 value-added score
15
Starting avg student score in 2006-07 V.A. score
3.07
Actual average gain in score of 2006-07 students
-0.06
Predicted average gain in student score in 2006-07
0.02
2006-07 value-added score in proficiency ratings
-0.09
Percentile score of 2006-07 value-added score
36
Min. error margin for 06-07 value-added score
3
Max. error margin for 06-07 value-added score
87
Number students used in 2005-06 value-added score
14
Start avg. of students, 2005-06 value-added score
2.97
Actual average gain of students 2005-06 score
0.03
Predicted average gain of students 2005-06 score
0.01
2005-06 value-added score in proficiency ratings
0.02
Percentile score of 2005-06 value-added score
54
Min. error margin for 2005-06 value-added score
14
Max. error margin for 2005-06 value-added score
90
Number students in citywide multi-year V.A. score
47
Start avg. of students, citywide multi-year score
2.93
Actual avg. gain in score of students, citywide
-0.01
Predicted avg. gain in student scores, citywide
0.01
Citywide multi-year value-added score in ratings
-0.03
Percentile score, multi-year citywide value added
39
Min. error margin, citywide multi-year value-added
19
Max. error margin, citywide multi-year value-added
63
Number of students used in citywide 2007-08 score
18
Start avg. student score in 07-08 citywide rating
2.86
Actual average gain in score in 07-08 rating
0
Predicted gain in score in 07-08 rating
0
2007-08 citywide value-added score in ratings
-0.01
Percentile score of 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
47
Min. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
11
Max. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
86
Number of students used in citywide 2007-08 score
15
Start avg. student score in 07-08 citywide rating
3.07
Actual average gain in score in 07-08 rating
-0.06
Predicted gain in score in 07-08 rating
-0.05
2007-08 citywide value-added score in ratings
-0.02
Percentile score of 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
36
Min. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
3
Max. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
87
Number students, citywide 05-06 value-added score
14
Start avg. score of students, citywide V.A. score
2.97
Actual average gain of students, citywide V.A.
0.03
Predicted average gain of students, citywide V.A.
-0.04
2005-06 citywide value-added score in ratings
0.06
Percentile score 2005-06 citywide value-added
57
Min. error margin, 2005-06 V.A. percentile score
16
Max. error margin for 2006-07 citywide percentile
91
The years of value-added data in report
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08