2007-2008, 4th, ELA

Choose a record to view

 
School year
School
Grade
Subject
2007-2008
PS/IS 180 HOMEWOOD
4th
ELA
2007-2008
PS/IS 180 HOMEWOOD
4th
MATH

Teacher evaluation

Subject
ELA
Grade
4th
School number
20K180
School name
PS/IS 180 HOMEWOOD
Experience level
10+ Yrs
Number of years of value-added data in report
3
First name of first teacher listed
OLGA
Last name of first teacher listed
GITLIN
First name of second teacher listed
Second name of second teacher listed
Percentile rank of multi-year value added score
52
Number of students used in multi-year score
58
Percentile rank of single year value-added score
83
Number of students used in value-added score
27
Percentile rank of score with top 3rd students
24
Performance percentile rank middle 3rd students
77
Percentile rank of score lowest 3rd students
54
Percentile rank of score with male students
75
Percentile rank of score with female students
29
Percentile rank of score, Eng. Language Learners
Percentile rank with students with disabilities
Starting avg. score, students in multi-year score
3.25
postTestMulti
0.06
predictedMulti
0.01
Multi-year value-added score
0.05
Minimum of margin of error multi-year rank
31
Maximum of margin of error multi-year rank
73
Starting average score of students in 09-10 score
3.07
Actual average score of students in 09-10 score
0.23
Predicted avg. score of students in 09-10 score
-0.06
2009-10 score
0.29
Minimum margin of error for 09-10 percentile rank
45
Maximum margin of error for 09-10 percentile rank
98
Starting avg. score of top 3rd performing students
3.81
Actual avg. score of top 3rd performing students
-0.21
Predicted avg. score, top 3rd performing students
-0.14
Value-added score with top 3rd performing students
-0.08
Minimum margin of error for rank top 3rd students
5
Maximum margin of error for rank top 3rd students
58
Starting avg. score middle 3rd performing students
3.05
Actual avg. score middle 3rd performing students
0.25
Predicted avg. score middle 3rd perf. students
0.09
Value-added score with middle 3rd perf. students
0.16
Min. of error margin for rank middle 3rd students
45
Max. of error margin for rank middle 3rd students
94
Starting avg. score lowest 3rd performing students
2.56
Actual avg. score lowest 3rd performing students
0.18
Predicted avg. score lowest 3rd perf. students
0.13
Value-added score lowest 3rd performing students
0.05
Min. of error margin for rank lowest 3rd students
11
Max. of error margin for rank lowest 3rd students
92
Starting average score of male students
3.23
Actual average score of male students
0.12
Predicted average score of male students
-0.03
Value-added score with male students
0.15
Min. of error margin for rank male students
45
Max. of error margin for rank male students
93
Starting average score of female students
3.27
Actual average score of female students
0.01
Predicted average score of female students
0.06
Value-added score with female students
-0.05
Min. of error margin for rank female students
9
Max. of error margin for rank female students
59
Starting average score of English Lang. Learners
Actual average score of English Language Learners
Predicted average score of English Lang. Learners
Value-added score with English Language Learners
Min. of error margin on English Lang. Learners
Max. of error margin on English Lang. Learners
Starting avg. score of students with disabilities
Actual average score of students with disabilities
Predicted average score students with disabilities
Value-added score with students with disabilities
Min. of error margin on students with disabilities
Max. of error margin on students with disabilities
Performance for percentile rank top 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Top 3rd score high or low; high error margin
Percentile rank of score with middle 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Mid 3rd score high or low; high error margin
Performance percentile rank lowest 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Lowest 3rd rank high or low; high error margin
Performance category for rank with male students
MIDDLE
* = Rank with male high or low; high error margin
Performance category for rank with female students
MIDDLE
* = Female rank high or low; high error margin
Performance for rank with Eng. Learners
* = Eng. Lang. rank high or low; high error margin
Performance rank with students with disabilities
* Disabled rank high or low; high error margin
Start avg score of top 3rd school-wide students
Actual avg. gain in score of top 3rd students
Predicted avg. gain in score of top 3rd students
Value-added score, top 3rd students in ratings
Percentile score, school-wide top 3rd students
Performance category, top 3rd performing students
* = Top 3rd rank high or low; high error margin
Min. error margin, school-wide top 3rd student.
Max. error margin, school-wide top 3rd student
Starting avg. score, school-wide mid 3rd students
3.44
Actual avg. score, school-wide mid 3rd students
0.08
Predicted average gain in middle 3rd students
0.07
Value-added score, school-wide middle 3rd students
0.01
Percentile score, school-wide middle 3rd students
43
Performance with school-wide middle 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Performance high or low; high error margin
Min. error margin, school-wide mid 3rd students.
14
Max. error margin, school-wide mid 3rd students
76
Starting avg. school-wide lowest 3rd students
2.82
Actual avg. gain, school-wide lowest 3rd students
0.21
Predicted avg. gain with lowest 3rd students
0.09
V.A. score with school-wide lowest 3rd students
0.13
Percentile score, school-wide lowest 3rd students
71
Performance for score, lowest 3rd students
MIDDLE
* = Performance was high or low; high error margin
Min. error margin with lowest 3rd students
40
Max. error margin with lowest 3rd students
91
Number students used for 06-07 value-added score
17
Starting avg student score in 2006-07 V.A. score
3.51
Actual average gain in score of 2006-07 students
-0.19
Predicted average gain in student score in 2006-07
-0.04
2006-07 value-added score in proficiency ratings
-0.15
Percentile score of 2006-07 value-added score
23
Min. error margin for 06-07 value-added score
1
Max. error margin for 06-07 value-added score
77
Number students used in 2005-06 value-added score
14
Start avg. of students, 2005-06 value-added score
3.43
Actual average gain of students 2005-06 score
0.05
Predicted average gain of students 2005-06 score
0.21
2005-06 value-added score in proficiency ratings
-0.16
Percentile score of 2005-06 value-added score
45
Min. error margin for 2005-06 value-added score
10
Max. error margin for 2005-06 value-added score
85
Number students in citywide multi-year V.A. score
58
Start avg. of students, citywide multi-year score
3.25
Actual avg. gain in score of students, citywide
0.06
Predicted avg. gain in student scores, citywide
-0.03
Citywide multi-year value-added score in ratings
0.09
Percentile score, multi-year citywide value added
68
Min. error margin, citywide multi-year value-added
47
Max. error margin, citywide multi-year value-added
85
Number of students used in citywide 2007-08 score
27
Start avg. student score in 07-08 citywide rating
3.07
Actual average gain in score in 07-08 rating
0.23
Predicted gain in score in 07-08 rating
-0.1
2007-08 citywide value-added score in ratings
0.33
Percentile score of 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
97
Min. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
77
Max. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
100
Number of students used in citywide 2007-08 score
17
Start avg. student score in 07-08 citywide rating
3.51
Actual average gain in score in 07-08 rating
-0.19
Predicted gain in score in 07-08 rating
-0.13
2007-08 citywide value-added score in ratings
-0.06
Percentile score of 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
26
Min. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
2
Max. error margin, 2007-08 citywide V.A. score
80
Number students, citywide 05-06 value-added score
14
Start avg. score of students, citywide V.A. score
3.43
Actual average gain of students, citywide V.A.
0.05
Predicted average gain of students, citywide V.A.
0.14
2005-06 citywide value-added score in ratings
-0.09
Percentile score 2005-06 citywide value-added
27
Min. error margin, 2005-06 V.A. percentile score
4
Max. error margin for 2006-07 citywide percentile
71
The years of value-added data in report
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08